← Search

Anil Punyapu

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Los Angeles, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
101 matches · 44W–57L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history101 matches
W
2026-10-31 · Breaking Bad Bucks/Pazirandeh/Burbank · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with MacLyn McRae
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-10-17 · Breaking Bad Reloaded/Jung-O'Neal/Burbank · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lucy Richmond mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-10 · Breaking Bad Bucks/Pazirandeh/Burbank · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Oliver Seaton
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-19 · Breaking Bad Bucks/Pazirandeh/Burbank · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gustavo Perez
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-13 · SFV LLW Breaking Bad Slicers/Pazirandeh/Burbank · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kenneth Jung
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-09-13 · Breaking Bad Bucks/Pazirandeh/Burbank · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Manoj Parmar
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-08-16 · SFV LLW Breaking Bad Slicers/Pazirandeh/Burbank · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with MacLyn McRae
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-15 · SFV LLW Breaking Bad Slicers/Pazirandeh/Burbank · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Oliver Seaton
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-08-08 · SFV LLW Breaking Bad Slicers/Pazirandeh/Burbank · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Manoj Parmar
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · SFV LLW Breaking Bad Slicers/Pazirandeh/Burbank · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kenneth Jung
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-20 · Breaking Bad Bucks/Pazirandeh-McRae/Burbank · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gustavo Perez
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-13 · LA LLW Queen Anne 4.0M - David Mayer · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gonzalo Montenegro
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
60%
3W–2L · 46% of games
3.5
72.2%
13W–5L · 55.1% of games
4.0
32.8%
21W–43L · 43.1% of games
6.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 33.7% of games
3.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
27 matches
#1 Singles
6%
6 matches
Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert