← Search

MacLyn McRae

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Sunland, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
153 matches · 100W–53L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history153 matches
W
2026-10-31 · Breaking Bad Bucks/Pazirandeh/Burbank · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anil Punyapu
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-10-18 · SGV Tennis Addicts-James Lee-Arroyo HS/SU8 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Lee
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-09-26 · SGV Tennis Addicts-James Lee-Arroyo HS/SU8 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Manoj Parmar
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-19 · Breaking Bad Bucks/Pazirandeh/Burbank · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Manoj Parmar
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-30 · SFV LLW Breaking Bad Slicers/Pazirandeh/Burbank · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Manoj Parmar
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-29 · SFV LLW Breaking Bad Slicers/Pazirandeh/Burbank · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Oliver Seaton
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-22 · SFV LLW Breaking Bad Slicers/Pazirandeh/Burbank · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Oliver Seaton
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-16 · SFV LLW Breaking Bad Slicers/Pazirandeh/Burbank · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anil Punyapu
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-08 · SFV LLW Breaking Bad Slicers/Pazirandeh/Burbank · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Oliver Seaton
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · SFV LLW Breaking Bad Slicers/Pazirandeh/Burbank · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Manoj Parmar
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-05 · SFV LLW Breaking Bad Slicers/Pazirandeh/Burbank · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kenneth Jung
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-28 · Breaking Bad Bucks/Pazirandeh-McRae/Burbank · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Manoj Parmar
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
100%
5W–0L · 58.1% of games
3.5
64.3%
9W–5L · 57.7% of games
4.0
67%
69W–34L · 57.9% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
50%
4W–4L · 55.9% of games
0.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 48.8% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 46.2% of games
8.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 66% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 60% of the time
#1 Doubles
60%
92 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
18 matches
#1 Male Doubles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams