← Search

Philip Smith

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Valencia, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
193 matches · 100W–93L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history193 matches
L
2026-11-01 · Paseo United/Zeltser-Smith/Paseo · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with TANIA JANICEK mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-31 · Paseo United4.0/Zeltser/Paseo · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Erickson
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-10-24 · Paseo United4.0/Zeltser/Paseo · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sebastian Carvajal
loading the estimate
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-18 · Paseo United4.0/Zeltser/Paseo · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sebastian Carvajal
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-10-11 · Paseo United/Zeltser-Smith/Paseo · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with TANIA JANICEK mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-11 · Paseo United4.0/Zeltser/Paseo · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sebastian Carvajal
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-10-04 · Paseo United/Zeltser-Smith/Paseo · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with TANIA JANICEK mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-09-27 · Paseo United4.0/Zeltser/Paseo · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Frank Abt
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-09-20 · Paseo United/Zeltser-Smith/Paseo · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with TANIA JANICEK mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-19 · Paseo United4.0/Zeltser/Paseo · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sebastian Carvajal
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-30 · Mixed Nuts/Ryan-Matibag/Paseo · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tracy HASBANIAN mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-23 · Tri Paseo United/Zeltser/Paseo · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with James Ordway
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 60.9% of games
3.0
36.8%
7W–12L · 45.9% of games
3.5
67.6%
25W–12L · 58.2% of games
4.0
50.6%
44W–43L · 49.2% of games
8.0
50%
8W–8L · 48.4% of games
3.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 54.7% of games
8.0mixed
31.2%
5W–11L · 44.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
81 matches
#2 Doubles
42%
80 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
26 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#3 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert