← Search

Adam Acosta

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Los Angeles, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
121 matches · 52W–69L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history121 matches
L
2026-08-23 · SGV Mixed Underdogs 55-Diamond Bar HS/SU10 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Trish Newlin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-01 · SGV Mixed Underdogs 55-Diamond Bar HS/SU10 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Adrienne Beauvois mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-28 · SGV Underdogs 55-Nuguid-Diamond Bar HS/SU10 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Chang
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · SGV Underdogs 55-Nuguid-Diamond Bar HS/SU10 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rafael Molina
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-14 · SGV Winner Winner Chicken Dinner-Moard-Arroyo/SA2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Young Song
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-14 · SGV Mixed Underdogs-Nuguid-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Trish Newlin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-17 · SGV Winner Winner Chicken Dinner-Moard-Arroyo/SA2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Derek Moard
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-09 · SGV Mixed Underdogs-Nuguid-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Trish Newlin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-25 · SGV Winner Winner Chicken Dinner-Moard-Arroyo/SA2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Luis Martinez
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-04-25 · SGV Mixed Underdogs-Nuguid-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lai Chan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-3
L
2026-04-19 · SGV Mixed Underdogs-Nuguid-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nicole Winslow mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-11 · SGV Winner Winner Chicken Dinner-Moard-Arroyo/SA2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Hirahara
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 53.5% of games
4.0
48.4%
31W–33L · 49.8% of games
8.0
38.1%
8W–13L · 41.9% of games
7.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 52.4% of games
8.0mixed
26.3%
5W–14L · 40.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
29 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe