← Search

Feibi Liu

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Irvine, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
79 matches · 52W–27L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history79 matches
L
2026-09-27 · SGV Underdogs Aces-Bui-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ted Nuguid
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-21 · SGV Underdogs Aces-Bui-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Chang
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-29 · SGV LLW Underdogs Aces-Bui-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #1 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-26 · SGV Underdogs Aces-Bui-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Walther Rodriguez
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-01 · SGV LLW Underdogs Aces-Bui-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pulkit Mathur
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-08 · SGV LLW Underdogs Aces-Bui-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Victor Nuguid
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-01-11 · SGV LLW Underdogs Aces-Bui-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Chang
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2025-11-30 · SGV LLW Underdogs Aces-Bui-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pulkit Mathur
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-11-02 · SGV LLW Underdogs Aces-Bui-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Chang
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-10-19 · SGV LLW Underdogs Aces-Bui-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with CHIH HAO PAN
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-10-12 · SGV LLW Underdogs Aces-Bui-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Victor Nuguid
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-10-04 · SGV LLW Underdogs Aces-Bui-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with CHIH HAO PAN
loading the estimate
1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
75%
9W–3L · 58.3% of games
4.0
64.2%
43W–24L · 56.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
12 matches
#1 Singles
13%
10 matches
#2 Singles
8%
6 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer