← Search

Jennifer Voci

Waxhaw, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
158 matches · 96W–62L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Voci to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history158 matches
W
2026-08-26 · VTolson/Petras (FCC) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shalini Patel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-10 · PSweeney (FCC) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christina McDonald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-03 · PSweeney (FCC) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with TARA RAND
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-17 · DShealy (Firethorne) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with TARA RAND
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-07-14 · DShealy (Firethorne) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Danielle Shealy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-10 · JVoci/Rand (FCC) · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6
W
2026-06-29 · JVoci/Rand (FCC) · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-06-12 · DShealy (Firethorne) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Danielle Shealy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-05-14 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-04 · PSweeney (FCC) · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-28 · VTolson/Petras (FCC) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-20 · JHerlong/LOCallaghan (FCC) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
68%
66W–31L · 57.6% of games
3.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 33.3% of games
5.5
84.6%
11W–2L · 59.2% of games
6.5
48.6%
17W–18L · 50.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 27% of the time
#3 Doubles
27%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
37 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
29 matches
#1 Singles
18%
28 matches
#2 Singles
10%
16 matches
#3 Singles
4%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert