Search

Erica Turkus

Fort Mill, SC
3.0C year-end 2025
160 matches · 74W–86L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
3.13
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 18 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
6%
stay 3.0
94%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 44% stay · 56% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.01. Lower than today’s 3.13 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
Fort Mill · 3.0
5 of 17
SC · 3.0
6 of 24
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Erica is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Erica has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Erica has gone from the 58th to the 80th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
2.5
47.6%
20W–22L · 47.1% of games
3.0
63.3%
31W–18L · 55.5% of games
3.5
11.1%
2W–16L · 36.8% of games
4.0
40%
4W–6L · 43.5% of games
5.5
42.9%
9W–12L · 49.7% of games
6.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 42.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history160 matches
L
2026-07-17 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Natalie Costello
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-6, 6-2
L
Laura Pratt / Saima Barkat
2026-07-06 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kara Ward
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-1
W
Tyler Newman / Amy Brittain
2026-06-15 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kara Ward
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-6, 0-6, 1-0
W
Melodie Ohaus / Kristin Webster
2026-06-12 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kara Ward
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-0, 6-2
W
Renata Riechelmann / Fran Kamp
2026-06-01 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Martin
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-2
L
Leah Hackworth / Mallery Horton
2026-05-29 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Natalie Costello
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Beth Rankin / Kelly Mosby
2026-04-27 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kara Ward
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bailey Zobel
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-1
L
Nicki Spang / Megan McHugh
2026-04-20 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annmarie Ringle
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-4
L
Miranda Berkovich
2026-04-17 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
Nannette Markham / Angie Mehrizi
2026-04-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Martin
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-1
L
Lindsay Mathews / Tracey Cook
2026-04-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kara Ward
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.