← Search

Bruce Work

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
South Dennis, MA
3.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
14 matches · 10W–4L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history14 matches
W
2026-06-13 · MCAC:Pernick · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Greg Stone
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-16 · MCAC:Pernick · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Greg Stone
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-5, 1-0
L
2026-05-02 · MCAC:Pernick · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Pernick
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
L
2021-03-27 · MCAC:Pernick:Pernick · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Garner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2021-02-20 · MCAC:Pernick:Pernick · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Wendell Anderson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
W
2021-01-09 · MCAC:Pernick:Pernick · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Garner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2020-11-21 · MCAC:Pernick:Pernick · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Mahoney
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2020-11-07 · MCAC:Pernick:Pernick · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mario Mariani
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
W
2019-03-16 · MC:Garner/Christenson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Reed Christenson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
W
2019-01-12 · MC:Garner/Christenson · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matthew Pernick
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-0
W
2019-01-05 · MC:Garner/Christenson · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chuck Deluga
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 7-5
L
2018-12-08 · MC:Garner/Christenson · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mario Mariani
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 56.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams