← Search

Tracy Jackson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Troy, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
274 matches · 156W–118L · seasons 2015–2026
Match history274 matches
L
2026-10-31 · TROY-Hughes 7.5W Weekend Combo F · #3 Doubles · with Daniela Stucchi
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-10-10 · TROY-Hughes 7.5W Weekend Combo F · #3 Doubles · with Stacy Cerget
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-24 · TROY-Li 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joseph Olmstead mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-14 · DCD- Siersma 18s 4.0 NW F1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carrie Leff
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-11 · DCD- Siersma 18s 4.0 NW F1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Belleau-Mills
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-08 · TROY-Hill 40s 4.0 DW F · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nadia Alchy
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · DCD- Siersma 18s 4.0 NW F1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Riya Cao
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-01 · TROY-Hill 40s 4.0 DW F · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Mosher
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-30 · BT-Cole 55s 7.0 NW F2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle O'Neill
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-26 · TROY-Li 18s 7.0X F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Bell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-25 · TROY-Jackson 40s 4.0 NW F3 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Berk-King
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-23 · BT-Cole 55s 7.0 NW F2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Valerie George
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams60 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 60% of games
2.5
50%
24W–24L · 54.1% of games
3.0
59%
23W–16L · 54.3% of games
3.5
57.4%
31W–23L · 54.2% of games
4.0
37.5%
6W–10L · 41.6% of games
5.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 57.4% of games
6.0
100%
8W–0L · 78.2% of games
6.5
52.9%
9W–8L · 57% of games
7.0
59.3%
16W–11L · 53.5% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
66.7%
16W–8L · 60.6% of games
7.0mixed
52.4%
11W–10L · 50.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
99 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
76 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
55 matches
#1 Singles
8%
21 matches
#2 Singles
5%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer