Kusull Kim
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ann Arbor, MI
189 matches · 137W–52L · seasons 2016–2024
Match history189 matches
L
Hanna Brewer / Jacob Brewer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
Becky Foster / Lorrie Pavlack
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
Maureen Ernst / Nancy Armentrout
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2019–2024
4CHIP-FORMICOLA 18&O WED 45 NW SEM
1LIB-SAULD 8.5W COMBO SEM F1
2CHIP-FORMICOLA SEM Tri-Level Showdown W 958575
2LIB-SAULD TRI-LEVEL W AUG 454035 SEM F1
4CHIP-FORMICOLA AD18&O 45NW WED SEM
4LIB-KORNFELD MIX18&O 70 SEM F3
4LIB-SAULD AD18&O 40NW TU SEM F3
4LIB-SAULD AD40&O 40NW TH SEM F2
1LIB-SAULD 40NW 40&O AD THURS SEM F2
1LIB-SAULD 45NW 18&O AD WED SEM F1
1LIB-SAULD 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F2
1LIB-SAULD 85 W/E WOMEN SEM F1
1LIB-SAULD women tri-level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 SEM F1
2LIB-KIM D3 DAY W tri-level showdown SEM
2OHCC-KERANEN 45NW 40&O AD MON SEM
4LIB-SAULD 40NW 18&O AD TUES SEM F2
6LIB-SAULD 8.0 mix 40&O SEM f1
1LIB-SAULD W tri-level 35 40 45 SEM
1LIB-inside-SAULD 8.0 18&O MIXED SEM F1
2CHIP-5cts-FORMICOLA 45NW 18&O AD WED SEM
2CHIP-FORMICOLA 85 WW COMBO SEM F1
2FAC-MACHUS 40DW 40&O AD WED SEM F2
2LIB-3cts-outside-SAULD 40NW 18&O AD TUES SEM F1
2LIB-SAULD 75 WW COMBO SEM F2
2LIB-inside-KIM 7.0 18&O MIXED SEM F1
4LIB-3cts-outside-SAULD 40NW 40&O AD THURS SEM F1
4LIB-KIM 7.0 40&O Mixed SEM F2
7CHIP-VOGLER 40 W sing sem
LIB-SAULD 8.0 40&O Mixed SEM
MI SEM OHCC-KERANEN 45NW 40&O AD MON SEM
2FAC-KIRSCHENBAUM 85 WOMEN COMBO SEM
2LIB-LAMMERS 40&OVER 70MIX F3
3CHIP-SLADE 40nw 18 tues sem F4
4LIB-SAULD 40&OVER 80MIX F2
2LIB-SAULD 75 combo women SEM F3
2LIB-STPIERRE 35NW 40 WED SEM F5
3LIB-KIM 35DW 18 THUR SEM F1
3LIB-KIM 7.0 mix 18&O sem f4
3LIB-KIM 70 mix 40&O sem f2
3LIB-LEVASSEUR 35 wsing fallwe sem f2
3LIB-LIPHAM 35NW 18 MON SEM F6
3LIB-SAULD 40NW 40 THUR SEM F2
4CHIP-BERG 85 combo women SEM F2
4LIB-SAULD 40NW 18 TUES SEM F3
4LIB-SAULD 8.0 mix 18&O sem f2
R2 CHIP-BERG WOMENS TRI-LEVEL 4.5,4.0,3.5 SEM
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
90.3%
28W–3L · 68.7% of games
4.0
66.2%
45W–23L · 57.9% of games
4.5
43.8%
7W–9L · 46.5% of games
7.5
75%
3W–1L · 61.8% of games
8.0
80%
4W–1L · 64.1% of games
8.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
12W–4L · 58.8% of games
8.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 63.7% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
75 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
42 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches
Singles
2%
4 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.