← Search

Karen Hogg

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lakeland, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
232 matches · 114W–118L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history232 matches
W
2026-10-19 · Beerman Dink Somewhere Else/Johnson · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Bettye Sykes
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-10-12 · Beerman Dink Somewhere Else/Johnson · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Bettye Sykes
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-10-06 · #2 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Shea Perez
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-10-05 · Beerman Dink Somewhere Else/Johnson · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Angela Johnson
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-09-15 · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Maria Ramka
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-08-28 · Plant City Tennis Addicts/Goodwin · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kandy Wood
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-14 · Plant City Tennis Addicts/Goodwin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Darch
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-07 · Plant City Tennis Addicts/Goodwin · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debra Summers
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-17 · Plant City Tennis Addicts/Goodwin · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debra Summers
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-10 · Plant City Tennis Addicts/Goodwin · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Goodwin
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-09 · Beerman Family / Ritter · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kandy Wood
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-05 · Beerman Family / Ritter · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Catherine Mueller
loading the estimate
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
39%
16W–25L · 47.7% of games
3.0
55.4%
51W–41L · 52.7% of games
3.5
41.4%
12W–17L · 44.9% of games
5.5
25%
1W–3L · 50% of games
6.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 59.7% of games
6.5
48.4%
15W–16L · 50.3% of games
7.0
47.1%
8W–9L · 51.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
86 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
43 matches
#1 Female Doubles
8%
19 matches
#1 Singles
4%
9 matches
#2 Female Doubles
3%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer