← Search

Jen Dagley

Heber City, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
193 matches · 79W–114L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jen Dagley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history193 matches
L
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Studdert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shana Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Wade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-06-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Mcbride
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-06-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Stone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-05-19 · Heber Hotties · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Studdert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-05 · Heber Hotties · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Benton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-28 · Heber Hotties · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Mcbride
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-03 · Heber Hotties · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Benton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-3
L
2026-02-17 · Heber Hotties · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Studdert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-6
W
2026-01-20 · Heber Hotties · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Benton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-0
W
2025-12-10 · Wasatch Rec Center-Wade/Stone · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jocelyn Bennion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
37.8%
31W–51L · 46.1% of games
3.5
45.7%
48W–57L · 47.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
41 matches
#4 Doubles
12%
24 matches
#1 Female Doubles
6%
11 matches
#2 Female Doubles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer