← Search

Taylor Haverkost

Salt Lake City, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
201 matches · 138W–63L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Taylor Haverkost to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history201 matches
L
2026-08-05 · Cottonwood Club-Haverkost · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-22 · Cottonwood Club-Haverkost · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-15 · Cottonwood Club-Haverkost · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqueline Heitner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-11 · Cottonwood Club-Haverkost · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqueline Heitner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-01 · Cottonwood Club-Haverkost · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqueline Heitner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-24 · Cottonwood Club-Haverkost · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-17 · Cottonwood Club-Haverkost · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Sliwa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-03 · Cottonwood Club-Haverkost · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
N/A
2026-05-27 · Cottonwood Club-Haverkost · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-20 · Cottonwood Club-Haverkost · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-06 · Cottonwood Club-Haverkost · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-14 · Cottonwood Club- Haverkost · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kumru Uruk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
72.9%
51W–19L · 62.1% of games
3.5
65.3%
62W–33L · 57.6% of games
4.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 47.2% of games
6.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 57.4% of games
6.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 65.6% of games
6.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 34% of the time
#1 Singles
34%
69 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
21 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
9 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer