← Search

Leah Lewis

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
OCALA, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
34 matches · 18W–16L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history34 matches
L
2025-06-09 · Fettes: Minnesota Slice Girls · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marsha Andrusko
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-06-02 · Fettes: Minnesota Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Judy Haeg
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-05-19 · Fettes: Minnesota Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Judy Haeg
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-05-05 · Fettes: Minnesota Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Judy Haeg
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
W
2024-07-16 · Fettes/Miller--Minnesota Slice · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debbie Anderson
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2024-07-09 · Fettes/Miller--Minnesota Slice · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Judy Haeg
loading the estimate
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W
2024-07-08 · Hackett: Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debbie Anderson
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2024-06-25 · Fettes/Miller--Minnesota Slice · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Judy Haeg
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2024-06-24 · Hackett: Slice Girls · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Judy Haeg
loading the estimate
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W
2024-06-18 · Fettes/Miller--Minnesota Slice · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Judy Haeg
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
L
2024-06-17 · Hackett: Slice Girls · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ann Hackett
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2024-06-11 · Fettes/Miller--Minnesota Slice · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Judy Haeg
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
50%
5W–5L · 52.6% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
59.1%
13W–9L · 56.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal