Search

Yvette Gama

Matthews, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
289 matches · 166W–123L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
3.59
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 22 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
13%
stay 3.5
87%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 57% stay · 43% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.49. Lower than today’s 3.59 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
Matthews · 3.5
12 of 29
NC · 3.5
50 of 112
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Yvette is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Yvette has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

3.03.54.0201920222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Yvette has gone from the 21st to the 8th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level10 levels played
0.0
50%
3W–3L · 48.7% of games
3.5
74.5%
38W–13L · 61.8% of games
4.0
33.8%
23W–45L · 43.9% of games
6.5
70%
7W–3L · 55.8% of games
7.5
58.1%
25W–18L · 53.8% of games
8.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 40.9% of games
3.5mixed
42.9%
9W–12L · 49.7% of games
7.0mixed
57.1%
12W–9L · 50% of games
7.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 51.2% of games
8.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 52.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history289 matches
W
Cobey Wagoner / Virginia Jenkins
2026-08-03 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sharon Cranford
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-2
W
N/Amixed
2026-07-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Twer
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joseph Dichak
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Erin Bloomberg / Sara Benedict
2026-07-27 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lori van Blarcom
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-3
L
Chin Lin / Dawn Castainmixed
2026-07-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joseph Dichak
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
Eden Serekeberhan / Kevin Foxmixed
2026-06-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Staley
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
Michael Fresina / Katie Kuehnermixed
2026-06-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Twer
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
Todd Creange / Kathleen O'Donnellmixed
2026-06-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Ovendorf
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joseph Dichak
+0.000better than expected — took 45% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-08 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sharon Cranford
0.048below expectation — took 35% of games against 58% expected
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W
Kate Wagner / Claude Underwoodmixed
2026-06-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joseph Dichak
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Judi Hollis / Peter Hollismixed
2026-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Staley
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.