← Search

Dan Schiffman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pasadena, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
190 matches · 42W–148L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history190 matches
L
2026-10-31 · SGV Sultans of Swing-Schiffman-Scholl Cyn/SA12 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tony Ruys de Perez
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
W
Default
2026-10-24 · SGV Sultans of Swing-Schiffman-Scholl Cyn/SA12 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tony Ruys de Perez
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-10-17 · SGV Sultans of Swing-Schiffman-Scholl Cyn/SA12 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paul Hubler
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-09-27 · SGV Sultans of Swing-Schiffman-Scholl Cyn/SA12 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paul Hubler
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-12 · SGV Sultans of Swing-Schiffman-Scholl Cyn/SA12 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marc Guggenheim
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-05 · SGV F.C. Aces-Stackhouse-Flint/SA2 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alex Y Lau
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-22 · SGV F.C. Aces-Stackhouse-Flint/SA2 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Mandel
loading the estimate
0-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-08-09 · SGV Flint Mix- Hegelund-Flint Cyn/SA 4 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elena Salinas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-25 · SGV Silver Servers-Schiffman-Scholl/SU10 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tony Ruys de Perez
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-25 · SGV F.C. Aces-Stackhouse-Flint/SA2 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Mandel
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-18 · SGV Flint Mix- Hegelund-Flint Cyn/SA 4 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elena Salinas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-05 · SGV Silver Servers-Schiffman-Scholl/SU10 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kasra Soufi
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams60 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
26.1%
29W–82L · 41% of games
3.5
13.9%
5W–31L · 30.8% of games
6.0
25.9%
7W–20L · 41.1% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
7.7%
1W–12L · 30% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 46% of the time
#3 Doubles
46%
88 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
62 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
21 matches
#1 Singles
6%
11 matches
#3 Singles
3%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams