← Search

Sergio Davila

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
La Habra, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
122 matches · 34W–88L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history122 matches
W
2026-10-31 · SGV Slamming Aces-Wong-La Habra/SU10 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with TAREK BABA
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-09-26 · SGV Slamming Aces-Wong-La Habra/SU10 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Wason Fu
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-12 · SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SA10 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Coco Song mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-12 · SGV Slamming Aces-Wong-La Habra/SU10 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with TAREK BABA
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-23 · SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SA10 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Coco Song mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-08-15 · SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SA10 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Darcie Hultberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
Default
2026-08-02 · SoCal/Woo/55&Over7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Don Woo
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-19 · SGV Slamming Aces-Wong-La Habra/SU10 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bruce Rubin
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-11 · SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SA10 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Coco Song mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-06-20 · SGV Underdogs-Wong-Diamond Bar HS/SU10 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with XINGJIAN Cao
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-14 · SGV Slamming Aces-Wong-La Habra/SU10 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bruce Rubin
loading the estimate
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-06 · SGV Underdogs-Wong-Diamond Bar HS/SU10 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tristan Gerardo
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
41.2%
21W–30L · 46.7% of games
3.5
0%
0W–6L · 21.7% of games
6.0
26.3%
5W–14L · 42.9% of games
7.0
7.7%
1W–12L · 24.9% of games
3.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 50.7% of games
6.5mixed
0%
0W–6L · 22.3% of games
7.0mixed
9.1%
1W–10L · 28.8% of games
7.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
32 matches
#2 Mixed Doubles
4%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#3 Mixed Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe