← Search

Shari Glickman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Gallatin, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
374 matches · 198W–176L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history374 matches
L
2026-10-31 · Glickman/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Hall
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-03 · Glickman/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diana Buss
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Brandon championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-09-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Brandon championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-29 · Glickman/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Maggie McAfee
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-23 · Glickman/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Traci Holton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-22 · Glickman/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kim Miles
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-02 · Glickman/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Michelle Salada
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-01 · Glickman/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Anna Hall
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-27 · Bargers/Collins/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sean Pomario mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-20 · Bargers/Collins/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sean Pomario mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-17 · Brandon/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzanne Parker Hazlett
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams110 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
80%
4W–1L · 68.3% of games
3.5
66.1%
113W–58L · 55% of games
4.0
33.3%
22W–44L · 45.9% of games
7.5
46.2%
24W–28L · 48.9% of games
8.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 65.6% of games
4.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 51.8% of games
7.0mixed
43.3%
13W–17L · 49.5% of games
7.5mixed
15.4%
2W–11L · 40.5% of games
8.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 44.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
133 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
128 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
88 matches
#1 Singles
3%
12 matches
#2 Singles
2%
9 matches
Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert