← Search

Diana Buss

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
NASHVILLE, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
119 matches · 88W–31L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2019. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history119 matches
W
2026-10-31 · Glickman/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alma Islas
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-10-03 · Glickman/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shari Glickman
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-17 · Glickman/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alma Islas
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-16 · Glickman/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Erin Akery
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-26 · Glickman/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Chris Leonard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-02 · Glickman/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Leonard
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-09 · Glickman/Nasvhille · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shari Glickman
loading the estimate
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-02 · Glickman/Nasvhille · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Leonard
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-03-21 · Glickman/Nasvhille · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shari Glickman
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-03-14 · Glickman/Nasvhille · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sally Major
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
L
2025-11-11 · Glickman/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shari Glickman
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-10-25 · Glickman/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sally Major
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
100%
4W–0L · 67.1% of games
3.5
100%
4W–0L · 73.1% of games
4.0
64.7%
44W–24L · 56.4% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.5
94.7%
18W–1L · 64.3% of games
8.5
70%
7W–3L · 55.6% of games
4.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 66.7% of games
7.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 69.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
26 matches
#1 Singles
8%
10 matches
#2 Singles
7%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova