← Search

Kimberly Heroman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
GEISMAR, LA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
341 matches · 238W–103L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history341 matches
W
Sagan Allen-Williams / Rebecca Angel
2026-10-29 · Heroman/18/40/WN/LEGA · #1 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Brown
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-10-28 · Caruso/18/4.0/WD/LEG · #2 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Mansur
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-10-22 · Heroman/18/40/WN/LEGA · #1 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Hope Suhor
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-10-02 · Caruso/18/7.5/CWD/LEG · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Megan Trahant
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-10-01 · Heroman/18/40/WN/LEGA · #1 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Georgia Day
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-30 · Heroman/18/7.5/CWN/LEG · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Mansur
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-09-30 · Caruso/18/4.0/WD/LEG · #1 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Campbell
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-2
L
2026-09-23 · Caruso/18/4.0/WD/LEG · #1 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Campbell
loading the estimate
6-7, 5-7
W
Rebecca Angel / Halle Medine
2026-09-17 · Heroman/18/40/WN/LEGA · #2 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Hope Suhor
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-09-16 · Caruso/18/4.0/WD/LEG · #1 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Huff
loading the estimate
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-09 · Heroman/18/7.5/CWN/LEG · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jena Vavasseur
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-09-03 · Caruso/18/7.5/CWD/LEG · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jena Vavasseur
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams97 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 74.2% of games
3.0
84.4%
38W–7L · 66% of games
3.5
71.1%
32W–13L · 59.8% of games
4.0
62.8%
54W–32L · 52% of games
5.5
100%
8W–0L · 66.7% of games
6.5
65.5%
19W–10L · 55.3% of games
7.5
69%
40W–18L · 57.6% of games
4.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 52.1% of games
6.0mixed
68.4%
13W–6L · 55.7% of games
7.0mixed
72.7%
16W–6L · 58.9% of games
8.0mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 51% of games
9.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
146 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
97 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
76 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
6 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova