← Search

Hope Suhor

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Baton Rouge, LA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
111 matches · 73W–38L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history111 matches
W
2026-10-29 · Heroman/18/40/WN/LEGA · #1 Female Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-10-22 · Heroman/18/40/WN/LEGA · #1 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Heroman
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-10-01 · Heroman/18/40/WN/LEGA · #2 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Dina Brach
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-09-30 · Wallace/18/7.5/CWN/BREC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Liz McCarthy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
Rebecca Angel / Halle Medine
2026-09-17 · Heroman/18/40/WN/LEGA · #2 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Heroman
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-09-16 · Wallace/18/7.5/CWN/BREC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Victoria Soileau
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-10 · Heroman/18/40/WN/LEGA · #1 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney McGraw
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-08-30 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Martin Padial mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Martin Padial mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Martin Padial mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-08-29 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Martin Padial mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-28 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Parker Delatte mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 63.3% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
78.9%
30W–8L · 58.2% of games
4.5
33.3%
6W–12L · 42.5% of games
7.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 52.3% of games
8.5
60%
3W–2L · 57.8% of games
4.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 61.6% of games
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 64.8% of games
9.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 54.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
23 matches
#1 Singles
7%
8 matches
#2 Singles
5%
5 matches
#2 Female Doubles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe