← Search

Dina Brach

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Baton Rouge, LA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
126 matches · 80W–46L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2021. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history126 matches
L
2026-10-08 · Heroman/18/40/WN/LEGA · #1 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Campbell
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-10-01 · Heroman/18/40/WN/LEGA · #2 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Hope Suhor
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-16 · Fontenot/40/4.0/MD/BREC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Newton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-12 · Day/18/Div2/WN/BREC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mandy LaCerte
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-24 · Day/18/Div2/WN/BREC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Campbell
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-06-04 · Fontenot/40/4.0/MD/BREC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Newton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-30 · Day/18/Div2/WN/BREC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathryn Loveless
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-23 · Dornier/18/4.0/WN/LEGA · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mandy LaCerte
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-12 · Dornier/18/4.0/WN/LEGA · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hope Suhor
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-19 · Dornier/18/4.0/WN/LEGA · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mandy LaCerte
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
W
2025-07-17 · Day/18/Div2/WN/BREC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mandy LaCerte
loading the estimate
1-1
L
2025-07-09 · Day/18/Div2/WN/BREC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mandy LaCerte
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
81.8%
27W–6L · 62.6% of games
4.0
47.5%
19W–21L · 46.9% of games
6.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 61.1% of games
7.5
59.1%
13W–9L · 58.3% of games
4.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 52.2% of games
8.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 61.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
27 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe