← Search

Laura Hottes

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Baton Rouge, LA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
288 matches · 221W–67L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history288 matches
L
2026-10-09 · Gauldin/18/7.5/CWD/BREC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jenny Kern
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-07 · Westerfield/18/4.0/WD/BREC · #4 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Cindy Plaia Meaux
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
Default
2026-10-01 · Hottes/18/4.0/WN/BREC · #3 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathryn Loveless
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-09-30 · Westerfield/18/4.0/WD/BREC · #4 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Kati Williamson
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-13 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maria Pereira championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-02 · Westerfield/18/4.0/WD/BREC · #3 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Johnson
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-21 · Gauldin/18/7.5/CWD/BREC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Doherty
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-31 · Gauldin/18/7.5/CWD/BREC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Adele Davis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-25 · Pereira/18/Div2/WN/BREC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maria Pereira
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-05-30 · Pereira/18/Div2/WN/BREC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathryn Baker
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-13 · Pereira/18/Div2/WN/BREC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maria Pereira
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-06 · Pereira/18/Div2/WN/BREC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Miller
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams92 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
2.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
80.4%
37W–9L · 63.2% of games
3.5
86.5%
64W–10L · 64.2% of games
4.0
58.1%
18W–13L · 51.6% of games
5.5
80%
4W–1L · 73.7% of games
6.5
76.9%
40W–12L · 59.4% of games
7.5
83.3%
20W–4L · 60.9% of games
3.5mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 59.9% of games
4.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
73.9%
17W–6L · 61.7% of games
7.0mixed
83.3%
10W–2L · 60.6% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 32.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
110 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
84 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
64 matches
#1 Singles
6%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal