← Search

Ed Hoosh

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Gainesville, GA
3.0M year-end 2024
i
Mixed Exclusive — this player’s rating comes only from mixed play
19 matches · 7W–12L · seasons 2018–2025
Match history19 matches
L
2025-11-06 · CCC-Jackson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacy King mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-10-23 · CCC-Jackson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Jackson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 7-6
L
2025-10-16 · CCC-Jackson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacy King mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-06-19 · NEGTA/Pamela Jackson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Loggins mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
L
2024-10-03 · CCC-Jackson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Hoosh mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 5-7
L
2024-05-02 · CCC-Jackson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Hoosh mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
W
2024-04-25 · CCC-Jackson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Hoosh mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2023-10-19 · CCC-Jackson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Hoosh mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 4-6
W
2023-06-01 · CCC-Jackson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela Hoosh mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2023-05-23 · CCC-Jackson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela Hoosh mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2023-05-02 · CCC-Jackson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela Hoosh mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 4-6
L
2023-04-20 · CCC-Jackson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela Hoosh mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 43.2% of games
7.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 42.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 68% of the time
#3 Doubles
68%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal