Search

Kim Jensen

year-end
33 matches · 16W–17L · seasons 20252026

Captains: add Kim Jensen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history33 matches
L
2026-08-26 · CSU GREEN · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-20 · CSU GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Teresa Nornes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-19 · CSU GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Andrews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-29 · LT BLUE · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joyce Hirano-Kuznik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-29 · CSU GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Teresa Nornes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-22 · CSU GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katheryn Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-07-16 · CSU GOLD · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricia Ehrlich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
Nancy Williams / Mary Jane Bartley
2026-07-15 · LT BLUE · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sara Mullarkey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-09 · CSU GOLD · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leticia Dunn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
Karen Johnson / Konnie Kosek
2026-07-08 · LT BLUE · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joyce Hirano-Kuznik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-2
W
Robyn Brady / Jody Wood
2026-07-02 · CSU GOLD · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leticia Dunn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-25 · CSU GOLD · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Andrews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Teams16 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
45.8%
11W–13L · 49.6% of games
7.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 53.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova