← Search

Teresa Nornes

FORT COLLINS, CO
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
53 matches · 23W–30L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Teresa Nornes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history53 matches
W
2026-08-26 · CSU GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Andrews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-20 · CSU GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Jensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-19 · CSU GREEN · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-08-05 · CSU GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-29 · CSU GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Jensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-22 · CSU GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth Dukart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-16 · CSU GOLD · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katheryn Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-09 · CSU GOLD · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katheryn Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-02 · CSU GOLD · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth Dukart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-25 · CSU GOLD · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maka Hammock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-18 · CSU GOLD · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leticia Dunn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-11 · CSU GOLD · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maka Hammock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
44.7%
17W–21L · 49.3% of games
6.0
50%
2W–2L · 46.6% of games
7.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 51.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
15 matches
#1 Singles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams