← Search

Whitney Irvin

Fort Collins, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
78 matches · 52W–26L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Whitney Irvin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history78 matches
W
2026-07-17 · FCCC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Schmelzle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-16 · FCCC WHITE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim McConnellogue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-07-10 · FCCC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Eiten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-09 · FCCC WHITE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jody Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-06 · FCCC WHITE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim McConnellogue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-02 · FCCC WHITE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricia Diehl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-28 · FCCC ORANGE · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Leon Patchett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-19 · FCCC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kiley Hupp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-06-18 · FCCC WHITE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Basta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-14 · FCCC ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Leon Patchett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
Elizabeth Smith
2026-06-11 · FCCC WHITE · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-06-04 · FCCC WHITE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim McConnellogue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
80%
4W–1L · 67.9% of games
3.0
73.5%
25W–9L · 57.9% of games
3.5
58.1%
18W–13L · 52.4% of games
6.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
17 matches
#1 Singles
18%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
7 matches
#2 Singles
6%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King