← Search

Amanda Snowdon

Fort Collins, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
108 matches · 89W–19L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Amanda Snowdon to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history108 matches
W
2026-08-19 · LT WHITE · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · with Sage Snowdon championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
Kimberly Parks / Maureen Breitenbach
2026-08-14 · #3 Doubles · with Sage Snowdon championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-12 · LT WHITE · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Sage Snowdon championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-29 · LT WHITE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sage Snowdon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-14 · LT RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricia Ehrlich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-10 · LT PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sage Snowdon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · LT RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sage Snowdon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-02 · LT RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sage Snowdon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-30 · LT RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angie Decklever
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-26 · LT PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Darcy Peters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
92.3%
12W–1L · 77.5% of games
3.0
91.1%
41W–4L · 65.5% of games
3.5
76.2%
16W–5L · 54.2% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 67% of the time
#1 Doubles
67%
72 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
26 matches
#1 Singles
6%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal