← Search

Janet Crespin

Greeley, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
213 matches · 144W–69L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Janet Crespin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history213 matches
W
2026-08-11 · TAG BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amber Slade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-05 · LT BLUE · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vicky Kmetz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-04 · TAG BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Sheets
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Melissa King / Edie LaFonte
2026-07-29 · LT BLUE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debora J Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-29 · TAG BRONZE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Larea Warden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-22 · LT BLUE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vicky Kmetz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-21 · TAG BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Larea Warden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-15 · LT BLUE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vicky Kmetz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-14 · TAG BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Larea Warden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-06-18 · TAG TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Sheets
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-16 · TAG ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Sheets
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-11 · TAG TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Larea Warden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
66%
99W–51L · 56% of games
7.0
74.5%
38W–13L · 58.9% of games
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
101 matches
#2 Doubles
45%
95 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
17 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams