Teams

TAG GREEN

2026 TRIO - NOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO - NOCO

9 players · average NTRP 3.43 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-04-25vs LT WHITELost 03
L#1 DoublesLarea Warden / Jessica Herold vs Angie Decklever / Sarah Duty1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer Schnell vs Kay Lucas2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBecky Buhler / Camille Benton vs Angela Brown / Stephanie Laramore6-0, 4-6, 0-1
2026-04-18vs FCCC ORANGEWon 21
W#1 DoublesNikki Ellis / Annette Nueske vs Lisa Olsen / Whitney Irvin6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJessica Herold vs Jane Schmelzle7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLarea Warden / Becky Buhler vs Molly Hudson / Emily Eiten0-6, 1-6
2026-04-11vs MLF TEALLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichelle Sheets / Janet Crespin vs Tricia Ehrlich / Kristen Frisch6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJennifer Schnell vs Katheryn Hill7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBecky Buhler / Nikki Ellis vs Samantha Gallegos / Tracy Hutton3-6, 3-6
2026-04-04vs FCCC ORANGELost 03
L#1 DoublesMichelle Sheets / Camille Benton vs Brittany Roeder / Molly Hudson3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer Schnell vs Elaine Valenza3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesNikki Ellis / Annette Nueske vs Jane Schmelzle / Whitney Irvin1-6, 1-6
2026-03-28vs LT WHITEWon 21
W#1 DoublesCamille Benton / Nikki Ellis vs Sage Snowdon / Sarah Duty6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJessica Herold vs Darcy Peters4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJanet Crespin / Larea Warden vs Angela Brown / Devin Taylor5-7, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO - NOCO
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MLF TEAL4111411110
2TAG GREEN2351023158

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Janet Crespin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.37
Jessica Herold
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.24
Becky Buhler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Camille Benton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Larea Warden
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Michelle Sheets
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Nikki Ellis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.04
Jennifer Schnell
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.89
Annette Nueske
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Sheets + Janet Crespin7556% games+8.5% vs expected
Michelle Sheets + Nikki Ellis71543% games−0.4% vs expected
Larea Warden + Janet Crespin833656% games−1.5% vs expected
Michelle Sheets + Annette Nueske2646% gamesnot enough data
Nikki Ellis + Annette Nueske2445% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Sheets + Larea Warden3266% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Sheets + Jennifer Schnell134 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Sheets + Becky Buhler134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Janet Crespin
130W–66L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
Jessica Herold
13W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Becky Buhler
12W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Camille Benton
106W–46L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Larea Warden
109W–61L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Michelle Sheets
66W–96L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Nikki Ellis
30W–58L career · 4 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.08
Jennifer Schnell
10W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.04
3
Annette Nueske
16W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
2.89

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.