← Search

Victoria Wheeler

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chesterfield, MO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
229 matches · 126W–103L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history229 matches
W
2026-10-31 · Fry/Hannigan · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kelly Lauman
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-10-27 · Kellogg-Grassle (FD) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Sinton
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-1, 0-1
L
2026-10-25 · Moore-Wheeler (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ritika Chand Bergfeld
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-5, 0-1
W
2026-10-18 · Moore-Wheeler (F) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Jackman
loading the estimate
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-11 · Moore-Wheeler (F) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teresa Entzeroth
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-10 · Fry/Hannigan · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Regan Hannigan
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-06 · Kellogg-Grassle (FD) · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-06 · Fry/Hannigan · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Regan Hannigan
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-29 · Kellogg-Grassle (FD) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Sinton
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-09-27 · Moore-Wheeler (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ritika Chand Bergfeld
loading the estimate
6-0, 2-0
L
2026-09-22 · Kellogg-Grassle (FD) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Kellogg
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-20 · Moore-Wheeler (F) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ritika Chand Bergfeld
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
50%
2W–2L · 55% of games
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
70%
70W–30L · 57.7% of games
4.0
43.9%
43W–55L · 48.2% of games
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
44.4%
8W–10L · 49.1% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 49.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
97 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
62 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams