Search

Michelle Kellogg

year-end
228 matches · 106W–122L · seasons 20192026

Captains: add Michelle Kellogg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history228 matches
L
2026-07-02 · Kellogg/Grassle · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Ernst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-04 · Kellogg/Grassle · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janea Schaeffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-22 · Moore/Wheeler (S) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Weiss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-2
L
2025-10-05 · Moore/Wheeler (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Mazzier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-10 · Blake · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Haas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-2
W
2025-06-19 · Blake · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robin Garlich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-06-12 · Blake · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Haas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Susan Fisher / Claire Boone
2025-05-08 · Blake · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ann Grassle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-05-04 · Moore/Wheeler (S) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carey Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-05-01 · Blake · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Molly Clipp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-04-27 · Moore/Wheeler (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carey Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2025-04-15 · Blake (SD) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Haas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Teams22 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
70%
42W–18L · 57.5% of games
4.0
36.5%
54W–94L · 44.9% of games
7.0
60%
3W–2L · 58.7% of games
8.0
46.7%
7W–8L · 47.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams