← Search

Carla Brown

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Saint Louis, MO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
95 matches · 52W–43L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history95 matches
L
2026-10-27 · Kellogg-Grassle (FD) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robin Shiras-Cody
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-13 · Kellogg-Grassle (FD) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robin Shiras-Cody
loading the estimate
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-06 · Kellogg-Grassle (FD) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Kellogg
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-05-26 · Blake · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathleen Odegard
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-05-08 · Blake · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dana Mazzier
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 7-5
L
2024-06-27 · Blake/Cody · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Molly Clipp
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-5, 0-1
L
2024-06-11 · Blake/Cody · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Grassle
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2024-05-30 · Blake/Cody · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Grassle
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2024-05-23 · Blake/Cody · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Grassle
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2023-12-05 · Blake/Fox (FD) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Mazzier
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2023-11-07 · Blake/Fox (FD) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Short
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2023-09-26 · Blake/Fox (FD) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Mazzier
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
62.3%
38W–23L · 54.6% of games
4.0
19%
4W–17L · 43.9% of games
7.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 62.9% of games
8.0
50%
2W–2L · 46.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
22 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe