← Search

Leslie Jiang

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Sierra Madre, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
137 matches · 63W–74L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history137 matches
W
2026-06-28 · FLoBs3.5/Galvagni/Scholl · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanna Gardner
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-27 · FLoBs3.5/Galvagni/Scholl · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Lee
loading the estimate
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-07 · SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SU10 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lea Zhang
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-03 · SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SU10 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Giang
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-28 · SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SA10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carmen Martinez
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-03-21 · SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SA10 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maribeth F Rodriguez
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-01 · SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SA10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandra Zane
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-02-21 · SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SA10 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandra Zane
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-17 · SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SA10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandra Zane
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-06-22 · SGV Dare Doubles-Gardner-WN/SA · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gustavo Banderas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-06-08 · SGV Dare Doubles-Gardner-WN/SA · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pat Guttormsen
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-05-18 · SGV Dare Doubles-Gardner-WN/SA · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Le
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
66.7%
28W–14L · 57.4% of games
3.5
35.8%
24W–43L · 43.6% of games
2.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 56.7% of games
7.0mixed
28.6%
4W–10L · 42.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
49 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
36 matches
#1 Singles
4%
6 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal