← Search

Violeta Daskalova

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mandeville, LA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
269 matches · 108W–161L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2024. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history269 matches
W
2026-10-13 · Dodson/18s/7.5/BC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amy Malloy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-09-29 · Dodson/18s/7.5/BC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katie Kabrich
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-15 · Dodson/18s/7.5/BC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katie Kabrich
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-25 · Dodson/18s/7.5/BC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Erinn Legendre
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-11 · Dodson/18s/7.5/BC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cherie Pausina
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-07-29 · Hodgins/18s/4.0-3.0.BC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bridgette Taylor
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-22 · Hodgins/18s/4.0-3.0.BC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney Dodson
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-24 · Hodgins/18s/4.0-3.0.BC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Reagan Daskalova
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-06-03 · Hodgins/18s/4.0-3.0.BC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Malloy
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-26 · Daskalova/40's/4.0/BC Day · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-23 · Daskalova/40's/4.0/BC Day · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Burdette
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-10 · Enk/18's/3.5/COQ Night · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Reagan Daskalova
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
80%
4W–1L · 58.1% of games
3.5
53.3%
49W–43L · 52% of games
4.0
22.4%
11W–38L · 39.2% of games
6.5
72%
18W–7L · 60.1% of games
7.5
27.9%
12W–31L · 40.6% of games
3.5mixed
61.1%
11W–7L · 53.4% of games
4.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 28.4% of games
7.0mixed
9.5%
2W–19L · 36.8% of games
8.0mixed
8.3%
1W–11L · 25.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
74 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
68 matches
#1 Singles
19%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
52 matches
#2 Singles
9%
23 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert