← Search

Courtney Dodson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mandeville, LA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
119 matches · 73W–46L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2026. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history119 matches
W
2026-09-29 · Dodson/18s/7.5/BC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rebecca MacMaster
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-09-15 · Dodson/18s/7.5/BC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amy Malloy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-09-14 · Cruise/40s/6.5/BC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Japonica Cruise
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-24 · Cruise/40s/6.5/BC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Japonica Cruise
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-18 · Dodson/18s/7.5/BC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Erinn Legendre
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-22 · Hodgins/18s/4.0-3.0.BC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Violeta Daskalova
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-30 · Hodgins/18s/4.0-3.0.BC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsay Johnson
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-10 · Hodgins/18s/4.0-3.0.BC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Malloy
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-28 · Dodson/18's.3.5/BC Day · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alixe Pizzo
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-14 · Dodson/18's.3.5/BC Day · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Celeste Collins
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-03-24 · Dodson/18's.3.5/BC Day · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Malloy
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-10 · Dodson/18's.3.5/BC Day · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsay Johnson
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
69.2%
36W–16L · 58% of games
3.5
50%
5W–5L · 49.7% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
58.3%
7W–5L · 54.2% of games
6.5
66.7%
12W–6L · 51.8% of games
7.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 42.3% of games
3.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 67.6% of games
3.5mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 41.2% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 49% of the time
#2 Doubles
49%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
29 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe