← Search

Tommy VanDaniker

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Virginia Beach, VA
3.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
211 matches · 129W–82L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history211 matches
L
2026-10-27 · Van Daniker - Love ‘em and leave ‘em · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Deaver mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-13 · Van Daniker - Love ‘em and leave ‘em · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Deaver mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-06 · Van Daniker - Love ‘em and leave ‘em · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Yuli Reams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-09-15 · McMahon - Sandbaggers Society · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vinny Sciortino
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-12 · McMahon - Sandbaggers Society · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danny Williams
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-09-01 · McMahon - Sandbaggers Society · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danny Williams
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-10 · McMahon - Sandbaggers Society · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Nohe
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-08 · PACC - Long · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adam Long
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-05-19 · Van Daniker - Nothing but Love · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Nyman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-05-18 · PACC - Long · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Will Beasley
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-05 · Van Daniker - Nothing but Love · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Courtney Violette mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-04 · PACC - Long · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Long
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
2.5
0%
0W–5L · 25.6% of games
3.5
77%
47W–14L · 58.8% of games
4.0
16.7%
2W–10L · 44.4% of games
7.5
76.2%
16W–5L · 55.5% of games
2.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 52.5% of games
4.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 65.6% of games
7.0mixed
72.7%
16W–6L · 57.8% of games
7.5mixed
71%
22W–9L · 58.7% of games
8.0mixed
42.9%
15W–20L · 46.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
86 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
64 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
51 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams