← Search

Janet Winch

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mount Pleasant, SC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
201 matches · 94W–107L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history201 matches
L
2026-10-25 · LCTA39/Smith/MPR · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Olga Haefele
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-10-22 · LCTA18/Mahony-Hoffman/Brickyard · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Shaw
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-10-21 · LCTA18/Cala-Hoffman/Brickyard · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mandy Kramer
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-10-13 · LCTA54/Adler/MPR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gretchen Looney
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-10-08 · LCTA18/Mahony-Hoffman/Brickyard · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandy Chitty
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-07 · LCTA18/Cala-Hoffman/Brickyard · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meta Boals
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-04 · LCTA39/Smith/MPR · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lee Heath
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-10-01 · LCTA18/Mahony-Hoffman/Brickyard · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Minhthu Nguyen
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-09-30 · LCTA18/Cala-Hoffman/Brickyard · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mercedes Logan
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-09-27 · LCTA39/Smith/MPR · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Della Barnhill
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-26 · LCTA54/Adler/MPR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dianne Newton
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-09-24 · LCTA18/Mahony-Hoffman/Brickyard · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gretchen Looney
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
53%
62W–55L · 51.3% of games
3.5
31.6%
6W–13L · 47.2% of games
5.5
29.4%
5W–12L · 43% of games
6.5
41.9%
13W–18L · 49% of games
3.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 51.4% of games
3.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 39.4% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
77 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
49 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe