← Search

Stephanie ONeal

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mount Pleasant, SC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
89 matches · 58W–31L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history89 matches
L
2026-11-02 · LCTA18/Richardson/MPR · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Candace Levy
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-22 · LCTA18/Boyd-Hiers Creekside · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine McDonald
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-18 · LCTA39/Urbanic/Creekside · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erica Lambert
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-08 · LCTA18/Boyd-Hiers Creekside · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peggy Urbanic
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-09-27 · LCTA39/Urbanic/Creekside · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Warnock
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-09-21 · LCTA18/Richardson/MPR · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Frost
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-08-20 · LCTA40/Arthur/Creekside · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Anderson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-11 · LCTA18/Boyd/Creekside · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Hannah Holena
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-07 · LCTA18/Boyd/Creekside · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stacey Powell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-06 · LCTA40/Chapman/Creekside · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Courtney Lewis
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-06-05 · LCTA18/Murphy/MPR · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with McRae Hogan
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-29 · LCTA18/Murphy/MPR · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Claypoole
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
72.7%
24W–9L · 56.8% of games
3.0
67.7%
21W–10L · 62.2% of games
3.5
50%
6W–6L · 45.5% of games
5.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 52.5% of games
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 52.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
7 matches
#1 Singles
7%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal