← Search

James Han

Centralia, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 53W–11L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add James Han to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
W
2026-09-13 · VAC-Clerget · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jerry Saul
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-05-03 · SWW-VAC-McKay · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Shanda mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-04-25 · SWW-VAC-McKay · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Schrank mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-04-18 · SWW-VAC-McKay · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patty Kilmer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-12 · Song/Choi · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chang Yeol Choi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-04 · Song/Choi · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Young Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-03-21 · SWW-VAC-McKay · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Schrank mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-03-07 · SWW-VAC-McKay · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Shanda mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-03-01 · VAC-Clerget · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chang Yeol Choi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-02-22 · Song/Choi · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Young Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-21 · VAC-Clerget · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jerry Saul
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-01-18 · VAC-Clerget · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chang Yeol Choi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
76%
19W–6L · 62% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
90%
9W–1L · 71.9% of games
6.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 71.3% of games
7.0mixed
94.4%
17W–1L · 68% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 66% of the time
#1 Doubles
66%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
7 matches
#1 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer