Search

Missy Kim

Clatskanie, OR
2.5C year-end 2025
75 matches · 30W–45L · seasons 20192026
Where Missy sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Missy is one of 123 women at 2.5 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 2.5 account for 3% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Missy has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.02019202020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 2.5, Missy has gone from the 68th to the 41st percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
2.5
50%
28W–28L · 48.2% of games
3.0
9.1%
1W–10L · 34.3% of games
6.0mixed
12.5%
1W–7L · 39% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history75 matches
W
N/A
2026-06-06 · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.094better than expected — took 100% of games against 49% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Margo Brown
2025-05-03 · #1 Singles · 2.5
+0.028better than expected — took 80% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Brooke Sunderland
2025-04-27 · #1 Singles · 2.5
+0.009better than expected — took 71% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Kathryn Kuntz
2025-04-26 · #1 Singles · 2.5
0.007about as expected — took 60% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Estefani Frias
2025-04-19 · #1 Singles · 2.5
+0.087better than expected — took 65% of games against 32% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
Chelle Kenison
2025-04-05 · #1 Singles · 2.5
0.019below expectation — took 48% of games against 55% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-03-16 · #1 Singles · 2.5
0.084below expectation — took 14% of games against 57% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
2025-03-08 · #1 Singles · 2.5
+0.012about as expected — took 33% of games against 33% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Jessica Decker
2025-03-02 · #1 Singles · 2.5
+0.032better than expected — took 71% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Vanessa Gallant / Angie Keam
2025-03-01 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Stephanie Pelton
0.018below expectation — took 14% of games against 32% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Aquila Hussain / Crispin Wong
2025-02-22 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Irina Stolerman
+0.051better than expected — took 92% of games against 61% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-01-11 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jennifer Gwin
0.031below expectation — took 14% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.