Search

James Eastwood

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2024
15 matches · 4W–11L · seasons 20192024
Where James sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

James is one of 1159 men at 3.5 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 59% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams7 teams · 2016–2024
CAC-VanLeuven
2024 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2024
CAC-Binns
2021 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2021
CAC-Binns
2019 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2019
CAC-Binns/Richardson
2018 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2018
CAC-Wheeler
2018 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2018
CAC-Binns/Richardson
2017 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2017
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

James has been a steady 3.5 across all 3 seasons on record.

3.03.5201920212024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, James has gone from the 12th to the 9th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level1 levels played
3.5
26.7%
4W–11L · 41.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history15 matches
L
2024-03-30 · CAC-VanLeuven · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Stone
0.040below expectation — took 32% of games against 52% expected
7-6, 6-0
L
2024-03-16 · CAC-VanLeuven · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Shaw
0.024below expectation — took 33% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2024-03-02 · CAC-VanLeuven · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Narus
+0.007below expectation — took 25% of games against 30% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2024-02-11 · CAC-VanLeuven · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Douglas Walker
0.013below expectation — took 33% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2024-02-04 · CAC-VanLeuven · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Shaw
+0.006better than expected — took 67% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
James Thomas / Jonathan Howe
2024-01-07 · CAC-VanLeuven · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Douglas Walker
+0.014better than expected — took 52% of games against 47% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-01-06 · CAC-VanLeuven · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allen VanLeuven
0.067below expectation — took 14% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
N/A
2021-05-06 · CAC-Binns · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charles Eastwood
+0.009better than expected — took 100% of games against 79% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2021-03-27 · CAC-Binns · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charles Eastwood
0.048below expectation — took 25% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2021-03-20 · CAC-Binns · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charles Eastwood
0.012below expectation — took 42% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2019-03-31 · CAC-Binns · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charles Eastwood
+0.036better than expected — took 71% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Evan Knight / Robert Truong
2019-03-30 · CAC-Binns · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charles Eastwood
+0.005about as expected — took 43% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.