Search

Dina Golden

Carrboro, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
172 matches · 103W–69L · seasons 20192026

Captains: add Dina Golden to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history172 matches
L
2026-07-29 · MLong.55T-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yvonne Acker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-10 · MLong.55T-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristine Potter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-29 · TCrowley-CHTC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-06-22 · TCrowley-CHTC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
Melissa Phillips / Monica Jenkins
2026-06-12 · MLong.55T-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Sickel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-06 · JPermutt-CHTC · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-05 · JPermutt-CHTC · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-29 · MLong.55T-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joelle Permutt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-15 · JPermutt-CHTC · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-11 · TCrowley-CHTC · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-23 · MGriffiths-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Ederle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-04-17 · DGolden-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Ederle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
70.7%
58W–24L · 58.6% of games
3.5
41.4%
24W–34L · 44.4% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 60.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams