← Search

Lauren Nicole Finke

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Arcadia, CA
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
330 matches · 264W–66L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history330 matches
W
2026-11-01 · OC CMTC - Kristina - Sun9 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Andrea Madrigal
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-10-10 · OC CMTC - Kristina - Sun9 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Aki Eguchi
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-10-04 · Setsual Healing/Collier/VNSO · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Maria Lupu
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-27 · BC-TorranceHigh/Collier5.0+ · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Andrea Madrigal
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-09-26 · Setsual Healing/Collier/VNSO · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Jacqueline Resler
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-13 · BC-TorranceHigh/Collier5.0+ · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Andrea Madrigal
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-09-12 · Setsual Healing/Collier/VNSO · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Maria Lupu
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-08-02 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Andrea Madrigal championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Andrea Madrigal championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Leticia Alcala championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-26 · LA LLW Tri Hards - Ami Belcher · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Leticia Alcala
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-07-18 · LA LLW Tri Hards - Ami Belcher · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Holly Verner
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams73 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level18 levels played
10.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
92.9%
13W–1L · 67.9% of games
3.5
90%
9W–1L · 70.6% of games
4.0
77%
77W–23L · 63.6% of games
4.5
80.9%
55W–13L · 64.5% of games
5.0
60%
12W–8L · 50.8% of games
8.0
100%
4W–0L · 57.3% of games
9.0
100%
6W–0L · 64.2% of games
3.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 70.9% of games
3.5mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 67.5% of games
4.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 60% of games
4.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
80%
12W–3L · 66.4% of games
8.0mixed
93%
40W–3L · 67.2% of games
9.0mixed
60%
15W–10L · 54.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
159 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
122 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
39 matches
#1 Singles
2%
6 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#1 Female Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal