Search

Kristin Messick

Cary, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
241 matches · 124W–117L · seasons 20192026

Captains: add Kristin Messick to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history241 matches
W
2026-08-19 · MD.Winters · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-11 · MD.Davis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dori Mcdarris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
Emily Jones
2026-07-20 · MD.Winters · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-08 · MD.Hart · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth McKinley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-03 · MD.Winzenz · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christine Reinke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-02 · MD.Winzenz · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brooke Rawls
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-01 · MD.Winters · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
Katie Baker
2026-04-27 · NMAC.Moreno · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-20 · We.Hanshew40A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Hanshew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-14 · MD.Grogan · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-04-13 · MD.Grogan · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
N/A
2026-04-13 · NMAC.Moreno · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
60%
3W–2L · 55.7% of games
3.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 62% of games
3.5
66.3%
67W–34L · 59% of games
4.0
25.6%
11W–32L · 40.6% of games
4.5
52.6%
10W–9L · 49.7% of games
6.5
45.2%
14W–17L · 50% of games
7.5
47.8%
11W–12L · 49.3% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova