← Search

Renee Wixon

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Minneapolis, MN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
70 matches · 38W–32L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history70 matches
W
2026-10-19 · Curfman/Wernet ES 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Casto
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-10-05 · Curfman/Wernet ES 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Casto
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-07 · Curfman/Wernet - Summer 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendi Stern
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-22 · Curfman/Wernet - Summer 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Herr
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-05-18 · Curfman/Wernet - Summer 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendi Stern
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-11 · Curfman/Wernet - Summer 3.5 · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-05-04 · Curfman/Wernet - Summer 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendi Stern
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
W
2025-07-08 · Fettes/Miller: Minnesota Slice · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Judy Haeg
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-06-24 · Fettes/Miller: Minnesota Slice · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sara Fenstermacher
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-06-03 · Fettes/Miller: Minnesota Slice · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patricia Fettes
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2024-07-15 · Hackett: Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debbie Anderson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-4
L
2024-06-24 · Hackett: Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ann Hackett
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
61.5%
24W–15L · 53.1% of games
3.5
35.3%
6W–11L · 47.4% of games
6.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 62.3% of games
6.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 37.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 59% of the time
#1 Doubles
59%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
7 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal