← Search

Tricia Fink

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tucson, AZ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
225 matches · 116W–109L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history225 matches
W
2026-10-23 · WHAT Happened 18 ? · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Giuliana Rodriguez
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Keresztes mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-02 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Keresztes mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-16 · SAZ 18 mixed 4.0- Darrel Tomasa · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Keresztes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-01 · SAZ 18 mixed 4.0- Darrel Tomasa · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Keresztes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-22 · SAZ 18 mixed 4.0- Darrel Tomasa · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Keresztes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-06-28 · Love Means Nothing · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Bellamy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-27 · SAZ 18 mixed 4.0- Darrel Tomasa · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Keresztes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-06-24 · SAZ 18 mixed 4.0- Darrel Tomasa · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Keresztes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-10 · DB- OVCC · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Bellamy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-07 · DB- OVCC · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Vernon Rohne mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-06 · Not In The Forecast · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tamra Williamson
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.5
82.4%
14W–3L · 70.8% of games
4.0
55.8%
43W–34L · 52.6% of games
4.5
19.4%
6W–25L · 36.8% of games
7.0
90%
9W–1L · 67.5% of games
8.0
59.1%
13W–9L · 52.4% of games
4.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 58.2% of games
4.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 49.3% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
33.3%
6W–12L · 46.7% of games
9.0mixed
47.4%
9W–10L · 48.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
93 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
54 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
40 matches
#2 Singles
7%
15 matches
Singles
6%
14 matches
#1 Singles
4%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal