← Search

Tucker Haynes

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Amarillo, TX
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
10 matches · 9W–1L · seasons 2024–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2024. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history10 matches
L
2026-04-22 · Boles · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Wyatt Beaugh
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-04-15 · Boles · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-04-08 · Boles · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-04-01 · Boles · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-08-23 · Boyles · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Gracelyn Anderson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-08-23 · Boyles · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Whitney Rose Farquhar mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-08-22 · Boyles · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Chrystal Nickol Aranda mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-3
W
2024-06-18 · Wilson · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2024-06-04 · Wilson · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2024-05-28 · Wilson · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
75%
3W–1L · 65.2% of games
9.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 60% of the time
#1 Singles
60%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
2 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
1 match
#3 Doubles
10%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer