← Search

Caroline Miller

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Spring, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
134 matches · 97W–37L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history134 matches
W
2026-05-16 · Lacey-Smashin' Senioritas-Cranebrook Park · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jacquelyn Winters championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-15 · Lacey-Smashin' Senioritas-Cranebrook Park · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Posey championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-25 · Lacey-Smashin' Senioritas-Cranebrook Park · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Louise Juillard
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-02-04 · Lacey-Smashin' Senioritas-Cranebrook Park · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Louise Juillard
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-01-29 · Lacey-Smashin' Senioritas-Cranebrook Park · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Posey
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-07 · Lacey-Smashin' Senioritas-Cranebrook Park · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Meg Garrison
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-10-29 · Wells - Strings of Glory - Cranebrook Park · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Louise Juillard
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-08 · Wells - Strings of Glory - Cranebrook Park · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Samira Collado-Yunes
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-05-01 · Winter-Love All-Woodlands Parks · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meg Garrison
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-04-16 · Winter-Love All-Woodlands Parks · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Lacey
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-04-02 · Winter-Love All-Woodlands Parks · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patty Short
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
W
2025-03-26 · Winter-Love All-Woodlands Parks · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Esther Davis
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
74.7%
56W–19L · 62.3% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 52.1% of games
7.0
74.1%
20W–7L · 62.1% of games
7.5
75%
6W–2L · 61.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 21% of the time
#1 Doubles
21%
28 matches
#1 Singles
20%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
19 matches
Singles
13%
18 matches
#2 Singles
11%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer