← Search

Jane Lacey

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Spring, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 26W–33L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history59 matches
L
2026-05-16 · Lacey-Smashin' Senioritas-Cranebrook Park · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Crisp championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-15 · Lacey-Smashin' Senioritas-Cranebrook Park · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Meg Garrison championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-11 · Lacey-Smashin' Senioritas-Cranebrook Park · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melinda Lehmann
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-29 · Lacey-Smashin' Senioritas-Cranebrook Park · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristen Perkins
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-01-14 · Lacey-Smashin' Senioritas-Cranebrook Park · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Viecelli
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-18 · Winter-String Courtets-Woodlands Parks · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Posey
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-06-11 · Winter-String Courtets-Woodlands Parks · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Hainebach
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-05-21 · Winter-String Courtets-Woodlands Parks · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi McKeever
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-05-14 · Winter-String Courtets-Woodlands Parks · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Esther Davis
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
L
2025-05-01 · Winter-Love All-Woodlands Parks · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Posey
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-04-16 · Winter-Love All-Woodlands Parks · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Miller
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-02-06 · Lacey-Senior-itas-Woodlands/Cranebrook Park · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Meg Garrison
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
31.2%
10W–22L · 43.2% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 60% of games
7.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 54.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
39%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match
Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe